FACILITATING ONLINE DISCUSIONS

In Muilenburg and Berge’s article A Framework for Designing Questions for Online Learning, they present advice for how to start and maintain a robust online discussion (Muilenburg & Berge, 2006).  Download Article

RATIONALE FOR USING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS

  • Facilitation of critical thinking skills – “involves not only knowledge of content, but also concept formation and analysis, reasoning and drawing conclusions, recognizing and avoiding contradiction, and other essential cognitive activities” (Scheinin, 1995).
  • Facilitation of higher-order thinking – “thinking creatively, critically, or in a decision-making or problem solving manner” (Sparapani, 1998).
  • Facilitation of distributed or shared thinking – “the connected mental acts of thinking are spread out among a number of different individuals” (Lipman, 1998)
  • Facilitation of constructive thinking – “constructing knowledge form personal experience . . . social interaction and collaboration to share multiple perspectives, and integrating personal experience, personal interpretation of the world and the perspectives of others to create socially-constructed meaning” (Wilson, Teslow, and Osman-Jouchous, 1995).

GETTING STUDENTS TO POST | CONSTRUCTING A GOOD QUESTION

Questions to promote deeper learning

  • That is an interesting point. What might someone who disagrees with you say to challenge your opinion?
  • Can you compare your response to xxx (other student post)? Are you both saying the same thing or not? Why or why not?
  • You make a good observation, Can you give us some examples to support your view?
  • What are alternatives to the one you suggested? Are there other solutions?
  • What is your reasoning for this? Can you compare this with the xxxx post? What is different and what is similar?
  • What might happen to xxxxx if your idea was implemented as you described?

ONLINE DISCUSSIONS USES

Online discussions can be used as single serving activities. As ongoing activity throughout the course. And everything in between. They can prepare students for a new topic before they`come to class. Just as easily, they allow you to continue a classroom discussion after a class period ends. If you do teach a face to face class then be sure to refer to each virtual discussion to make sure students see the value and participating and connections between the two. There are dozens of reasons to conduct online discussions.You can use them to:

  • aggregate ideas,
  • apply course concepts to real-world scenarios,
  • foster critical thinking, and
  • facilitate collaborative reflection.

EXAMPLE

Use a discussion forum to allow students to both reply to your prompt and each other. If you want a more interactive discussion consider a critical thinking activity such as a case study or debate. Ask students to support their original posts with outside sources. Then, ask students to reply to two or more students. Make sure students support their replies as well. Let them know that answers like, “good job”, smiley face are not acceptable. Model what a good peer reply should look like. We looked at the when and why of virtual discussions.

FACILITATION

To maintain student participation over time:

  • Use effective prompts.
  • Try different activity types.
  • Have multiple due dates. One due date for the student’s original post. And another due date for their replies to other students.
  • To elevate the quality of student work, provide clear instructions and expectations and model what original posts and replies should look like.
  • To manage your own instructor workload, consider using student moderators who summarize the discussion each week. For example, they can identify the three most common ideas and the top three questions that no one else could answer.
  • You don’t always have to reply to every student thread, but you do have to maintain a presence in each and every virtual discussion.
lynda faciliate online discussions
To watch this video, first login to lynda.com, then click on the link below
Login to UW-Madison lynda.com |  Watch lynda.com video 

 RESOURCES

  • Lipman, M. (1998).Teaching students to think reasonably:  Some findings of the philosophy for children program.  The Clearing House, 71(5), 277-280).
  • Muilenburg, M. & Zane L. Berge. (2006). A framework for designing questions for online learning. Academia.edu
  • Scheinin, P.M. (1995). Improving Thinking Skills. [Online} http://helsinki.fi/scheinin/abs6.html  [6/27/1997].
  • Sparapani, E.F. (1998). Encouraging thinking in high school and middle schoo:  constraints and possibilities.  The Clearing House, 71(5), 274-276.
  • Wilson, B., Teslow, J., & Osman-Jouchoux, R. (1995). The impact of constructivism (and postmodernism) on ID fundamentals. In B. B. Seels (Ed.), Instructional Design Fundamentals: A Review and Reconsideration (pp. 137-157). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.